I believe it is a widely accepted "rule of thumb" that when a person is at their own personal low, his creative potential is at its own personal pique...
Two semesters ago I posted a poem that I had read in my Creative Writing class by Maxine Kumin, whose...let's just say "uniqueness", had piqued my interest. I had no intention of making this a regular event, but it seems that fate has drawn me to yet another class with interesting poetry selections. This time around, it's my British Literature class.
Now, what follows is, according to my own preferences, a good poem. However, the material covered within is well within the boundaries of what several individuals I know would consider "pornography". Whether or not I agree with that is beside the point. The question that rests on my mind after reading this is "What exactly forms the line that separates literature from smut?" What exactly is the justification for a work like this to be kept in the literature section of a bookstore well segregate from a work like this?
While I appreciate the art behind this specific piece of 17th century literature, I must be honest and admit that I laughed out loud (LOL'd, for those of you that are computer savvy) at various points. May it bring you the same joy as it brought me.
The Imperfect Enjoyment
by John Wilmot, Second Earl of Rochester
Naked she lay, clasped in my longing arms,
I filled with love, and she all over charms;
Both equally inspired with eager fire,
Melting through kindness, flaming in desire.
With arms, legs, lips close clinging to embrace,
She clips me to her breast, and sucks me to her face.
Her nimble tongue, Love's lesser lightning, played
Within my mouth, and to my thoughts conveyed
Swift orders that I should prepare to throw
The all-dissolving thunderbolt below.
My fluttering soul, sprung with the pointed kiss,
Hangs hovering o'er her balmy brinks of bliss.
But whilst her busy hand would guide that part
Which should convey my soul up to her heart,
In liquid raptures I dissolve all o'er,
Melt into sperm, and spend at every pore.
A touch from any part of her had done 't:
Her hand, her foot, her very look's a cunt.
Smiling, she chides in a kind murmuring noise,
And from her body wipes the clammy joys,
When, with a thousand kisses wandering o'er
My panting bosom, "Is there then no more?"
She cries. "All this to love and rapture's due;
Must we not pay a debt to pleasure too?"
But I, the most forlorn, lost man alive,
To show my wished obedience vainly strive:
I sigh, alas! and kiss, but cannot swive.
Eager desires confound my first intent,
Succeeding shame does more success prevent,
And rage at last confirms me impotent.
Ev'n her fair hand, which might bid heat return
To frozen age, and make cold hermits burn,
Applied to my dead cinder, warms no more
Than fire to ashes could past flames restore.
Trembling, confused, despairing, limber, dry,
A wishing, weak, unmoving lump I lie.
This dart of love, whose piercing point, oft tried,
With virgin blood ten thousand maids have dyed;
Which nature still directed with such art
That it through every cunt reached every heart--
Stiffly resolved, 'twould carelessly invade
Woman or man, nor aught its fury stayed:
Where'er it pierced, a cunt it found or made--
Now languid lies in this unhappy hour,
Shrunk up and sapless like a withered flower.
Thou treacherous, base deserter of my flame,
False to my passion, fatal to my fame,
Through what mistaken magic dost thou prove
So true to lewdness, so untrue to love?
What oyster-cinder-beggar-common whore
Didst thou e'er fail in all thy life before?
When vice, disease, and scandal lead the way,
With what officious haste dost thou obey!
Like a rude, roaring hector in the streets
Who scuffles, cuffs, and justles all he meets,
But if his King or country claim his aid,
The rakehell villain shrinks and hides his head;
Ev'n so thy brutal valor is displayed,
Breaks every stew, does each small whore invade,
But when great Love the onset does command,
Base recreant to they prince, thou dar'st not stand.
Worst part of me, and henceforth hated most,
Through all the town a common fucking post,
On whom each whore relieves her tingling cunt
As hogs on gates do rub themselves and grunt,
Mayst thou to ravenous chancres be a prey,
Or in consuming weepings waste away;
May strangury and stone thy days attend;
May'st thou ne'er piss, who didst refuse to spend
When all my joys did on false thee depend.
And may ten thousand abler pricks agree
To do the wronged Corinna right for thee.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
ahahahhahaha dude. you made one of your tags cunt. hahahahhahahah.
when people get too personal in expressing their carnal desires/fears/whatever, thats when it stops being literature.
there has to be a line of decency that all writers should be aware of. There's this notion of disciplining your mind and your own thoughts from getting to vulgar or indecent, and you dont do it out of shame of your fellow man, rather than the modesty that you have before God/life/existence/whatever. Now i know this subjective but clearly theres a distinction between good and evil, and the question is who decides what's good or evil. And thats where i fall back to religion, because it appears to me to have an accurate sense of what's good and bad.
on top of that, writers/poetshave an unspoken task of imparting some sort of wisdom on the world. i can understand this guy is frustrated, heck maybe he didn't even want his poem to be put on blast in public and here we are 300 years later posting it on the internet for everyone to see.
but yeah i guess what distinguishes pornography from the rest of the pack is that someone made a moral judgement and decided pornography falls into the category of evil.
Now who did make the judgement is another question. and the question following that how did they decide what good and bad was in the first place?
And again its simple, and rationale for me to believe that God made the criteria of good and bad, and Holy men were the ones who preached/enforced it.
Post a Comment